“Gerardo R., as he is known in court documents, never beat his children. He did not torture them or stab them or brutalize them. He was a loving father who’d always been a part of his children’s lives — and when their mother lost custody, he immediately stepped forward. But he had to fight for his children’s right to live with him.
“Why? Because he was unable to afford housing deemed satisfactory to the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services. For that, his children were denied the chance to live with their father and even had their right to have him in their lives terminated forever, until a California appellate court intervened.”
Richard Wexler, Executive Director of the National Coalition for Child Protection, has an interesting commentary on the problems with the Los Angeles child welfare system, saying the system is being tied up with “a huge number of false allegations, trivial cases and cases in which family poverty is confused with neglect.”
I would imagine that most of the false allegations are made in custody battles, and it’s one more example of how the truly abused are harmed when people use false abuse claims to manipulate the system for personal gain.
From Wexler’s L.A.’s beleaguered foster care kids (Los Angeles Times 9/16/09):
Contrary to the stereotype, most parents who lose their children to the county and to foster care are nothing like the sadists and brutes who make headlines. Tragedies like the ones this summer — in which two youngsters, Dae’von Bailey and Lars Sanchez, were killed within family units that the county had evaluated — are rare. Far more common are cases in which parental poverty is confused with parental neglect. Other cases fall squarely between the extremes, the parents neither all victim nor all villain.
As it turns out, it is a serious mistake to pull children out of their homes just because their parents are poor or imperfect, just as it is a mistake to leave them in homes where parents are dangerous brutes. A landmark study of 15,000 typical foster care cases showed that children placed in foster care usually fared worse in later life than comparably maltreated children left in their own homes.
The foster children were more likely to commit crimes, more likely to become pregnant as teenagers and less likely to be able to hold a job as young adults. Another study found that only one in five former foster children was doing well as a young adult. That’s not really surprising, considering that foster children often bounce from placement to placement, emerging years later unable to love or trust anyone.
These everyday horrors of foster care don’t get much notice; they accumulate over years, and they are often hidden by confidentiality laws that protect not the children but the child welfare system itself. So the public, understandably, assumes that the only mistake the system makes is to keep children in dangerous homes.
In fact, agencies like the Department of Children and Family Services can be arbitrary, capricious and cruel. They do indeed leave some children in dangerous homes, even as they take more children from homes that are safe or could be made safe with the right kinds of help.
The two errors are directly related.
When children are left in dangerous homes, it’s almost always because a caseworker didn’t have the time to talk to one more witness, make one more phone call to law enforcement or check another record. What’s overwhelming those workers is a huge number of false allegations, trivial cases and cases in which family poverty is confused with neglect. By the time the court cases were finished, the county had spent years keeping Gerardo R.’s family apart — time, in effect, stolen from other cases and other children who could have been in real danger.
Read the full piece here.
It may well be just a case of careless wording. I hope it is. But Dear Abby’s June 12 column implies that if a mother isn’t taking care of her children properly, putting them in foster care is a more viable option than placement with their father. From 
Washington Nationals outfielder Elijah Dukes seems to be making an effort to put his problems behind him, but the troubled ballplayer certainly has not been a 
Dukes did not attend today’s hearing, which came after attorneys for NiShea Dukes filed a motion for civil contempt, a means to claim unpaid fees.
Background: I recently partnered with Dr. Ned Holstein and 