1. Take Action 2. Get Involved 3. Give a Gift
About | Contact | Home

Archive for the ‘Single Fathers’ Category

Bristol Palin Files for Sole Custody, but Levi Johnston Should Have Equal Role in Their Son’s Life

Sunday, January 10th, 2010 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Levi Johnston, the teenage father of Bristol Palin’s 1-year-old son Tripp, has had to fight to be a father to his child. Johnston claims (and the Palins backhandedly acknowledged) that Levi’s access to his son has been restricted, and that for a long time the Palins weren’t allowing him to take his child out of their home for visitation, effectively requiring Levi’s visitation to be supervised by them.

Now, in a power play so unfair that even feminist writer Emily Bazelon of Slate.com is criticizing it,  Bristol Palin is demanding sole custody of Tripp. In Why Bristol Palin Shouldn’t Get Sole Custody (12/30/09), Bazelon writes:

[W]hat has Levi done that warrants sole custody for Bristol at this early moment in a child’s life? Nothing is the likely answer…Modeling for Playgirl doesn’t make Levi a model for decorous fatherhood, but it’s hardly enough to strip him of his right to help make decisions about his son’s life, which is what sole legal custody for Bristol would mean…

In her court filing, Bristol goes after Levi by arguing that he “remains without a regular job or steady source of income. He has obtained money by selling stories to the media about his son Tripp, ex-fiance Bristol and the Palin family. … Recently he has engaged in modeling, including risqué modeling for Playgirl magazine.” OK, so Johnston isn’t on his way to an investment-banking career. But Bristol’s accusations hardly show that he’s a bad father…Levi deserves the chance to keep his promises to the judge and to Tripp.

Unwed fathers–particularly those young and poor—are often stereotyped as uncaring and irresponsible. Yet the new “Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing study”—the most comprehensive long-term study of poor, unmarried parents ever conducted–found that young, poor single fathers often see caring for and protecting their children to be their highest calling.

Harvard Sociologist Kathryn Edin, one of the study’s authors, says “When we ask guys, ‘What would your life be like without your children?’…we expected them to say, ‘Life would be so much easier, I’d be so much better off, I wouldn’t have these child support obligations.’ Instead, they say…’Everything good in my life is because of my kids.’”

Levi’s dad, Keith Johnston, told People magazine that his son is a devoted and “proud father.” Levi said his son means “everything” to him.

“He’s my little boy. I don’t know what I’d do without him,” he said. “When I hold him, it’s an amazing feeling. I just shake.”

Fathers & Families believes that Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston should share custody of their son. Fathers & Families’ Board Chairman Ned Holstein, MD, a Harvard-trained public health specialist, explains:

Research shows that father involvement is critical for children. Many teen/young fathers like Levi Johnston are pushed aside after the relationship with their children’s mothers ends. We often hear phrases like ‘deadbeat dad’ and ‘abandonment,” yet young dads are often kept out of their children’s lives by intransigent mothers and a family law system which is often indifferent to their bonds with their children.

Back in the Spring of last year, Bristol Palin and the Palin family told reporters that they were going to respect Levi’s important role in Tripp’s life, and we publicly commended them for it. It is unfortunate that the Palins have now reversed themselves.

In my experience as a physician, I’ve seen countless young fathers who are conscientious and devoted to their children. I’ve also seen many children who utterly adore their young fathers. Tripp needs Levi as an important and equal parent in his life–anything less is harmful to both the child and his father.

Joba & Harlan Chamberlain: ‘We Did It, Dad’

Sunday, November 8th, 2009 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Young New York Yankees pitcher Joba Chamberlain was raised by a single father, Harlan Chamberlain, who was partially crippled with polio as a child and grew up in foster homes. Harlan also raised Joba’s sister.  The Yankees recently beat the Philadelphia Phillies in the World Series, and there were several special father-child moments in the aftermath. From Yahoo Sports:

The throng of media members around the makeshift stage seemed impenetrable, but Harlan Chamberlain motored his way through all of the cameras and notepads anyway. Reaching a blue barrier, he stopped his scooter, strained to look over a crowd of world champion Yankee ballplayers and tried to get a glimpse of his son. When that proved useless, he simply resorted to his considerable vocal chords.

“Jaaaaaaahba!” he yelled. “Jaaaaaaaaaahba!”…Joba Chamberlain put down the giant blue Yankee flag he had been waving up on stage. The big Yankees pitcher hopped off the stage, disappeared from the view of the Fox cameras and quickly made a beeline for his father. When they came together, they wrapped each other in a huge rocking bearhug.

It wasn’t long before both were crying.

They said the same thing over and over.

“We did it, dad,” Joba said.

“We did it,” Harlan said.

“We did it,” Joba said.

“We did it,” Harlan said.

And on and on. They held tight for almost a minute. Their eyes were red when they let go.

You see the Yankees’ $200+ million payroll and it’s easy to get cynical…But then you see this very simple and very real scene of a 24-year-old pitcher sharing the hug of a lifetime with his dad and you remember that those father-son relationships — one of the only things that really matter — are at the very heart of this great game that we love.

The same dynamic was on display everywhere at Yankee Stadium on Wednesday night. Way up in the upper deck, a dad tossed his little son into the air whenever Hideki Matsui came through (which was often). A mid-20s hipster sitting next to them made sure to ask one of my co-workers to snap a photo of him and his pops with his grainy cell phone camera. CC Sabathia did his postgame interviews with his little son on his shoulders the whole time.

And while all of those tiny little snapshots meant the world to those pictured in them, none of them seemed quite as remarkable to outsiders as the one taken by the Chamberlains.

Their story has been told often since Joba became a pitcher with the Yankees. Harlan was stricken with polio as a child and his health problems have confined him to the trademark scooter that gets him recognized by Yankee fans everywhere. Despite his limitations, he raised both Joba and his sister in Nebraska and provided for them while working in a prison. The sad story of Joba’s mother is sadly well-known — she’s facing 20 years in jail for a drug charge — but he’s always had the love and support from an extraordinary father. They call each other their best friends. It’s impossible for them to be any closer.

I caught up with Harlan later on Wednesday night and asked him what it was like to see his son pitch a scoreless inning in a World Series clincher. Then I asked him what it was like to have the hug on the field with him afterward. His eyes were still teary as he talked.

“I told my son for years that he would do this, we would talk about getting to the World Series all the time” said Harlan while stopped near home plate of Yankee Stadium. “We just shared that moment while realizing that he did it. I pinched myself a few times. It’s pretty awesome.

“We love each very much. This whole adventure in life is about family and in our case, it’s about father and son.”

Write Ft. Worth Star-Telegram in Support of Single Father’s Column

Monday, June 1st, 2009 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

“When my son was taken from me across state lines, there was no help; certainly not from the law.

“In the tradition of the American and Texan spirit, I went and got him on my own.

“After we returned, I sought some assistance to get him in day care and make sure he had food.

“Imagine my shock when a state-appointed worker told me that she would not help me with my child, but if the mother came in they would help her.

“The last words out of her mouth stung in a way that I could not imagine.

“‘That boy needs to be with his mother,’ she said.”

A great column by Chris Taylor in the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram–read it below then use the address provided to write a Letter to the Editor in support. From Taylor’s Texas fathers with sole custody of children growing in numbers (Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, 5/31/09):

The Texas attorney general’s office recently released its list of top child-support evaders, and there was something notable that was never mentioned.

It’s not called the list of deadbeat dads anymore. Of the top five worst evaders, two were women. Did you read any news stories on this?

I know I didn’t.

Granted, I’m more sensitive to this matter.

Until a few months ago, I was a single father with full custody of my son.

While this often made me an anomaly at school functions, soccer games and child birthday parties, it gave me a unique perspective on how this world treats men who want to be involved in their children’s lives.

Let’s just say it is not very positive.

When my son was taken from me across state lines, there was no help; certainly not from the law.

In the tradition of the American and Texan spirit, I went and got him on my own.

After we returned, I sought some assistance to get him in day care and make sure he had food.

Imagine my shock when a state-appointed worker told me that she would not help me with my child, but if the mother came in they would help her.

The last words out of her mouth stung in a way that I could not imagine.

“That boy needs to be with his mother,” she said.

Eleven years ago, single dads were unusual. According to the last census, it is a quickly growing demographic. At last check, Texas had about 16,000 fathers who have sole custody of their children.

This leads to a few questions: Why haven’t we heard more about this? Why is a man who wants to have a relationship with his children looked upon as an awful thing?

From my experience, I have encountered hostility from women for my choice in life. It almost seems like my existence damages the myth that children are better off with their mothers. I won’t go as far as to say that there is an underground conspiracy to keep men from being active participants with their offspring, but there certainly is a one-sided perspective to the situation.

Being a single father has many obstacles. We have to work twice as hard just to get custody of our children. Even an unfit mother gets the benefit of the doubt.
Teachers, generally being female, want to talk to the mother when they call or when I go to open house.

I admit I do get a kick out of telling them I am the mother.

This isn’t to say that one parent is ever better than two, but maybe it is time to re-examine what men can do when their children are involved.

I am evidence that we can surprise you when given the chance.

Write a Letter to the Editor of the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram for publication by clicking here.

Comment on the piece by clicking here.

‘Your daughter loves you and needs you—don’t ever let anyone tell you you’re of secondary importance’

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Sacks, a veteran of helping single dads, believes otherwise, “Your daughter loves you and needs you and you are good at raising her - don’t ever let anyone tell you you’re of secondary importance, because you’re not.”

Elizabeth Donovan, M.A., writes for Parenting magazine and founded www.ParentingPink.com, a site geared to helping parents raise daughters. She recently interviewed me and several single fathers for a new piece on dads & daughters–Single Fathers Raising Daughters: How to build a strong, meaningful relationship.

Donovan lists “10 Tips to Strengthen the Daddy/Daughter Relationship.” I thought this one was particularly good:

Be a Steady, Consistent Force. As a single father, you are the “rock” in your daughter’s life. She will look to you for safety, love, and a sense of how men should treat her. When you say you will put her on restriction or give her a time-out, you must follow through. Never threaten to punish her unless you’re willing to do so. Otherwise, your daughter will learn that she can ‘take advantage’ of dad and her behavior will worsen. By providing the right amount of calm and consistency, your daughter will grow to respect you – and herself.

For slightly different reasons, I’ve always thought that the follow-through on consequences is very important for boys, too, and I’ve kept that in mind raising my son who is now (gasp) about to finish 11th grade. Time flies.

Donovan writes:

A recent study found a correlation between men daughters chose to date and the relationship they have with their fathers. If a girl’s father is supportive, loving, and respectful, she tends to chose someone who will treat her the same way. Having a father as a positive role model can help daughters feel beautiful, confident, and empowered.

That certainly sounds right but I don’t remember that study–does anybody know what she’s referring to?

In the article Michael Long, father of a 23-year-old daughter, says that when his daughter was in high school, he knew who all her daughter’s friends were dating. I do that with my son and his friends, too, except that it changes around so quickly that you can’t keep track of the players without a scorecard.

Another of the fathers interviewed, Martin Bearg, an attorney and single dad who raised two children, saw his daughter pass away from cancer at age 16. Ouch–I can’t imagine anything worse…

The article can be seen here. My answers to Donovan’s questions, some, of which were in the article, are below.

Q. How did you connect with your daughter?

R. My favorite thing is when I put her to bed, tell her stories and she falls asleep in my arms. For the first nine years of her life, she fell asleep in my arms like that practically every night.

That’s less common as she grows up, of course. One challenge is to stop treating her like she’s my little princess and start treating her more like a teen or a young woman.

One way we interact in a more adult way is to talk about politics and history, both of which interest her. Apparently she listens and often voices her opinions—last night she told me that in her class they had been talking about the proposed LAUSD teachers’ strike, and out of the blue her teacher called on her and asked, “I suppose your father has an opinion about it?”

Q. What is the most difficult part?

R. There are certain things which boys and men find attractive in girls/women, things which are hard-wired and won’t change. I don’t want my daughter to ever feel that she isn’t attractive to boys or that she doesn’t have many opportunities to find love and companionship with boys. On the other hand, I don’t want to push her to be something she isn’t, or to make her feel that I want her to change or that she isn’t perfect just as she is (because, of course, she is perfect just as she is).

Q. What is the most rewarding part of raising your daughter?

R. A friend of mine said “A man never knows what love really is until he has a daughter.” It’s totally true. The most rewarding part of raising her is just having her love me. For me, there has never been nor will there ever be anything better.

Q. What words of advice can you offer other single dads raising a daughter?

R. When she’s moody/hormonal/difficult, get in the habit of underreacting. Be a steady, loving father who she knows is always there for her but who also knows when to back off.

You are the man in her life and every interaction she has with men throughout her life is going to be colored by her interaction with you. Your daughter loves you and needs you and you are good at raising her—don’t ever let anyone tell you you’re of secondary importance, because you’re not.

F & F Commends Bristol Palin for Deciding to Co-Parent with Teen Father Levi Johnston

Monday, May 18th, 2009 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Levi Johnston, the teenage father of Bristol Palin’s 4-month-old son Tripp, has fought to be a father to his child, taking his case to the media via the Today Show, Larry King Live and others. Johnston claimed (and the Palins backhandedly acknowledged) that his access to his son was restricted, and that the Palins weren’t allowing him to take his child out of their home for visitation, effectively requiring all visitation to be supervised by them.

Now People magazine and others have reported that Bristol Palin has changed her mind, saying, “I’d love for Levi to be a part of [Tripp’s] life,” and following through on her commitment. Todd Palin, Tripp’s grandfather, says, “They’re working out a schedule…I know both of them will love and care for their son together.”

Bristol Palin should be commended for her decision–research shows that father involvement is critical for children.

Many loving fathers like Levi Johnston are pushed aside after the relationship with their children’s mothers ends. We often hear phrases like ‘deadbeat dad’ and ‘abandonment.’ Yet while it’s true that some fathers don’t come through for their children, many divorced or separated fathers fight a long, hard battle to remain a part of their children’s lives. Fathers are often kept out of their children’s lives by intransigent mothers and a family law system which is often indifferent to the loving bonds children share with their fathers.

Johnston position isn’t unusual. Newly-released data from the National Center for Health Statistics shows that now 40% of children born in the United States are born out of wedlock—a 26% increase since just five years ago. These children’s unwed fathers–particularly those young and poor—are often stereotyped as uncaring and irresponsible. Yet the new “Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing study”—the most comprehensive long-term study of poor, unmarried parents ever conducted–found that young, poor single fathers often see caring for and protecting their children to be their highest calling.

Harvard Sociologist Kathryn Edin, one of the study’s authors, says “When we ask guys, ‘What would your life be like without your children?’…we expected them to say, ‘Life would be so much easier, I’d be so much better off, I wouldn’t have these child support obligations.’ Instead, they say…’Everything good in my life is because of my kids.’”

Levi’s dad, Keith Johnston, told People that his son is a devoted and “proud father.”

Levi said his son means “everything” to him.

“He’s my little boy. I don’t know what I’d do without him,” he said. “When I hold him, it’s an amazing feeling. I just shake.”

Research Shows Even Low-Income Single Fathers Are Often Highly Motivated Parents

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

Most unmarried, low-income fathers strive to be good parents, Kathryn Edin, a professor at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, said in a lecture at the Haldeman Center on Friday.

That’s a quotation from this article about a talk Kathryn Edin (pictured) gave at Dartmouth. Edin and fellow researcher Timothy Nelson studied poor, single fathers in Camden, New Jersey over a period of seven years.

Many of these fathers were teenagers. One salient point she makes is that poor fathers in high-crime areas view fatherhood as a heroic undertaking because of the danger of their surroundings.

Here’s Edin quoted on her website at Harvard:

Q. You’ve just touched on your latest research on the role of fatherhood in the lives of unmarried, low income men. Tell us more about that research.

Edin: When we ask guys, “What would your life be like without your children?” – these are low income fathers that we’ve been interviewing in four cities, Laura Lien, Timothy Nelson and I – we expected them to say, “Life would be so much easier, I’d be so much better off, I wouldn’t have these child support obligations.” Instead, they say “I’d be dead or in jail. Everything good in my life is because of my kids.”

Edin’s work supports the findings of the Fragile Families & Child Wellbeing study conducted of 5,000 children over five years by Sara McLanahan, Irwin Garfinkel and many others of the best researchers in the field, including Edin. That study has produced a gold mine of data which in turn has produced scores of papers analyzing the findings. Here is the link to the Fragile Families website. I regard it as indispensible to understanding the increasing phenomenon of unmarried parents and their children. The database is large and reliable and the analytical documents are a wealth of information about, among other things, unmarried fathers and children.

It too finds that the vast majority of poor single fathers strongly desire an ongoing relationship with their children, that those relationships tend to erode over time and that the father’s relationship with the mother is the single most important factor in whether he remains a part of his child’s life or not.

Other studies I’ve discussed here show that mothers tend to be the gatekeepers of father involvement with children. If she allows and encourages it, he takes an active role in childrearing; if she criticizes and discourages it, he doesn’t. Still others show that child welfare workers’ attempts to involve fathers in the lives of at-risk children, as an alternative to foster care, are largely controlled by mothers as well. Combine the three and it becomes clear that, even among the poorest and youngest fathers, one of the main things keeping them from parental responsibility is mom.

Further corroborating that, Edin furnished me with an as-yet unpublished paper based on Fragile Families data which, together with much previous research, describes fatherhood as “a ‘package deal’ where a father’s relationship with his child is contingent on his relationship with the mother.” The paper investigates that concept in terms of unmarried parents who tend to move in and out of intimate relationships more readily than do married parents. It finds that mothers moving on to subsequent relationships are a “driving force” behind the decline in father involvement over time. Indeed, a mother’s new relationship is twice as likely to result in reduced father involvement as is a father’s finding a new partner.

There are still those, like former Senator Rick Santorum, who try to convince us that fathers are child-averse. That’s flat not true. Of course some are, but overwhelmingly, fathers want an active, hands-on role in childrearing. That includes the youngest and poorest of dads. It’s long past time that media and public policy start to reflect the truth that social science has known for years.

Putative Father Registries, Part III

Thursday, January 15th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

Columbus, OH–On January 9, I posted a piece entitled “A small - and lucky - victory” about an Ohio man, Jason Wilkins, who seems to be about to get custody of his daughter, Madalyn Grace.  Here’s some more about why I call him lucky.

Ohio is one of at least 24 states with a Putative Father Registry.  Under “normal” circumstances, Wilkins would never have been told that his daughter existed - and thus denied custody - because of the Ohio Putative Father Registry.  It was just luck that he was told by relatives of the child’s mother that he had a daughter. 

I’ve studied putative father registries for about ten years.  Begun by the State of New York in the 1970s, they are enacted to “streamline” adoption proceedings, which is code for “they’re enacted to bypass fathers in the adoption process.”

Here’s how they work.  Generally speaking, husbands have parental rights to children born to their wives.  But single men have a much tougher time establishing parental rights.  In states with putative father registries, men who have sex with a woman who is not their wife must file a form with the state claiming paternity of the child, if there is one.  If they don’t and the woman chooses to place the child for adoption, the man is not entitled to be informed of the proceedings.  His rights are terminated by a court without notice to him or his consent.  Needless to say, that makes it a lot easier to complete adoption cases – just cut the father out of the loop.

If that’s not bad enough, states often do their best to keep their registries secret.  In Texas, where I live, no money is budgeted to publicize the registry with the not surprising result that few men know about it.  I took an informal poll of 100 men in Houston and not one of them had ever heard of the Texas Paternity Registry or its potential to deprive them of their rights. 

Also, the law specifically requires certain places like Justice of the Peace Courts, County and District Courts, hospitals and adoption agencies to keep forms available for men to file.  I checked on examples of each of those and only one, an adoption agency, even knew what I was talking about.  The result: less than 1% of Texas single fathers file a form with the registry each year. 

It turns out that Ohio and Texas are a lot alike in that regard as this funny and infuriating article makes clear.

This dogged determination to keep these registries secret is important when it comes to the Constitution’s guarantee of rights to due process of law.  In law school you learn that at a bare minimum, due process requires that, before a state can deprive a person of his rights, he must be afforded (a) notice of the charge against him and (b) a hearing, i.e. the opportunity to tell his side of the story.  These rights are afforded to everyone from a mass murderer to a double-parker.

Everyone, that is except single fathers.  Their rights are terminated in registry states without actual notice and without a hearing.  And that pretty much spells out the status single fathers have in this country – lower than Jack the Ripper.

A Small–and Lucky–Victory

Monday, January 12th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

Bellville, OH–But a victory nevertheless.

Back in June, an Ohio woman, Tabitha Potter, left the little girl shown above in a storage container outside the First Baptist Church of Bellville.  She was less than one day old.  Through some miracle the little girl didn’t die and spent the next three weeks in the hospital before being placed in foster care.

Another miracle occurred when Potter’s relatives told friends of Jason Wilkins he might be the father.  Wilkins found an attorney and got a DNA test which proved he was.

But of course as things go in so many family court systems in this country, that didn’t mean he had any rights to the child.  Children Services of Richland County didn’t want the child removed from foster care.  I mean, why trust the actual father, who is not only ready, willing and able but “excited” about the prospect of caring for his daughter, when you can find strangers to do the job?

But lo and behold, it looks like Wilkins will get custody after all.  The court has given him the right to visit the little girl, now named Madalyn Grace, for the purpose of father-child bonding.  The judge in the case now anticipates that Children Services will relent and recommend that Wilkins be given custody of his child.

Meanwhile Potter has been charged with two misdemeanor counts stemming from her abandonment of Madalyn Grace.  Ohio is one of many states with a “safe haven” law.  Under it, mothers may turn over a newborn infant to EMS, police or a hospital within 72 hours of birth without any legal consequences.  Apparently even this was beyond the mother who simply left the child in front of a church to survive or die as fate willed.

Reading between the lines of these articles, it’s easy to see how close Wilkins came to losing his daughter.  First, she could have died there in her box outside the church.  Second, Children Services apparently had neither the obligation nor the inclination to locate Wilkins.  As they saw it, their job was to find an appropriate set of foster parents and let it go at that.  It was just luck that he ever learned about his daughter.

Third, Wilkins’ attorney said “Jason had trouble getting a paternity test.”  Now why would that be?  Why would a man, claiming to be the child’s father and desiring custody have trouble getting permission to do the one thing necessary to prove paternity?  You’d think the court and Childrens Services would welcome such an event.  Apparently not.  As usual, single fathers are perceived to be a dangerous impediment to placing the child for adoption.

But for now at least it seems that, come January 12, Jason Wilkins and Madalyn Grace will begin their life together.  And that’s a victory - a big one - for them both.

Glenn Discusses Single Motherhood/Fatherhood by Choice Movement on The Ron Smith Show in Baltimore

Monday, January 12th, 2009 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Baltimore, MD–I discussed the Single Motherhood by Choice and Single Fatherhood by Choice movements on The Ron Smith Show on WBAL AM 1090 in Baltimore on Wednesday. I had previously blogged about the issue here.

As we’ve discussed on many occasions, the media has portrayed Single Motherhood by Choice very positively with a lot of “you go girl” cheerleading.  A recent CNN article talked about an emerging trend of single men, some straight and some gay, employing surrogates and becoming fathers themselves.

While I can understand some men wanting to have children that cannot be taken from them in a divorce or separation, I do not condone Single Fatherhood by Choice.  Children need mothers just as they need fathers, and I believe it is selfish and counterproductive to deprive a child either of a father or of a mother.

Ron Smith made the point that for a wealthy single man, Single Fatherhood by Choice is an intelligent economic decision.  He reasoned that wealthy men may be taken advantage of by women he called “Golddiggers”, and be hit very hard financially in a divorce.  Even though surrogacy is expensive — around $100,000 per child, according to CNN — it controls and manages the risk.  By contrast, wealthy men who marry have a lot more to lose.

Another caller, a friendly Irish woman, said that I was wrong because many fathers whose wives died in childbirth or from other causes successfully raised their children.  I replied that while this is no doubt true, those children lost a tremendous amount, even if they never knew their mothers.

I’ll give CNN and others credit in the sense that they confirmed that single fathers are quite capable of caring for children, just like mothers are.  However, it seems that many go from “single motherhood is good” straight to “single fatherhood is good” seemingly without stopping to consider that both are a problem.

Ron also made the point that he believes that the economic crisis will actually strengthen the family, or at least help arrest family breakdown.  His logic is, simply, that divorce can only exist under relative affluence because it is so expensive.  People who cannot afford to support one household on their incomes will be very hesitant to divorce and put themselves in a position where they have to support two households.

I have mixed emotions on this.  I have no doubt that Ron’s view of the link between affluence and the ability to divorce is valid.  On the other hand, many, many couples are torn apart by arguments over money.  These arguments are doubtlessly intensifying right now.

One piece of advice for husbands who are trying to prevent their angry wives from divorcing — tell her this:

We’re fighting like crazy over money now.  What will it do when the same incomes that are not enough to support one household are forced to support two?

And Now, Single Fatherhood by Choice

Monday, January 5th, 2009 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director

Los Angeles, CA–I’ve long criticized the Single Motherhood by Choice movement for ignoring the importance of fathers and the two-parent family. To learn more about the problems with the Single Motherhood by Choice movement, see my co-authored column Are Single Mothers the ‘New American Family?’ (World Net Daily, 9/28/06) and my debate on Fox’s nationally-syndicated Morning Show with Mike and Juliet here.

Now we apparently have a trend towards Single Fatherhood by Choice–single men using surrogates to have children and build a family. From CNN’s Single men turning to surrogates (12/23/08):

Jeff Walker says from as far back as he can remember, he always wanted to be a father.

“It was always something I knew, from the time I was a child.” Just like his 3-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, who says she wants to be a mommy someday, Jeff says, “I knew I wanted to be a daddy.”

Walker, a Manhattan music executive, says he and his partner had talked about adopting a baby years ago. But after three emotionally draining, failed attempts at adoption, they decided to turn to surrogacy. They contacted Circle Surrogacy, a Boston agency that specializes in gay clients. Their child was conceived with a donor egg, and then the embryo implanted in the surrogate, or carrier.

After Elizabeth was born, Walker and his partner separated. He then made a critical decision — to become a dad again, single, and by choice.

“I realized my family, my two-dad family was going to look different than I thought it was going to look,” he said. Without a partner, he would face even steeper challenges raising Elizabeth and a sibling alone. Walker says he gave the decision a lot of thought.

“That was the only part that was really controversial, because I do think there are a lot of challenges that single parents face, but at the same time I felt I was capable of handling those challenges,” he said.

His second daughter, Alexandra, was born two years ago to the same surrogate, implanted with an egg from a different donor.

Walker, 45, is one of a growing number of single men — both gay and straight — who are opting to become fathers alone, with the help of gestational surrogacy.

Surrogacy experts say because the practice is not regulated, many surrogacy arrangements are handled privately by individuals. Precise figures are hard to come by, but experts say there’s no doubt the United States is experiencing a surrogacy baby boom.

Celebrities like Ricky Martin and Clay Aiken announced this year they had had babies with the help of surrogates and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, representing scores of reproductive clinics, reports that the number of gestational surrogate births in the country quadrupled between 1996 and 2006…

Walker and other men are willing to pay well over $100,000 to have a baby through surrogacy — the final cost depending on the number of IVF treatments necessary and how much is paid by insurance…

Steven Harris, a New York malpractice and personal-injury attorney, says he gave up trying to get married when he realized his primary motive was to start a family.

Harris, 54, says he knew he made the right decision after 21-month old Ben was born.

“I thought getting married was the only way to go, because I did want a family. But having Ben, I feel complete now,” Harris says.

I think the article misses the main reason why men (or straight men, anyway) want to have children through a surrogate–so they can be assured that they won’t lose the child upon divorce or separation.

A woman can have a child and know that unless the situation is exceptional or she behaves outrageously, she’ll always be a regular part of her child’s life.

For men, being a father is a roll of the dice–if mom decides she doesn’t want you around anymore, it can be hard to preserve your relationship with your child. The article doesn’t mention this, in part because some of the ‘Single Fathers by Choice’ are gay men, and in part because fathers losing their kids isn’t something the mainstream media likes to talk about.

My overall opinion? I can absolutely understand why a man would want to have a child through a surrogate, thus ensuring that he’ll always be able to be a father to his child. Still, I can’t condemn Single Motherhood by Choice and turn around and applaud Single Fatherhood by Choice.

I believe that mothers are just as important for children as fathers, and that it’s wrong to have a child as a single dad and deny the child a mother. What’s needed is not a Single Fatherhood by Choice movement but instead a powerful Shared Parenting movement to ensure that both parents’ right to their children is protected after a divorce or separation.

The CNN article cites Ricky Martin as an example. I discussed Martin in my blog post Sorry Ricky Martin, but Women Shouldn’t Create Single Parent Households–and You Shouldn’t Either